home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: rocky.scvnet.com!usenet
- From: ggandcg@val.net (Graham Gelberg)
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,comp.sys.mac.comm
- Subject: Re: I've Had It With Supra 28.8. It's a piece of shit.
- Date: Mon, 22 Jan 1996 06:05:32 GMT
- Organization: SCVNET
- Message-ID: <4dvaku$4td@rocky.scvnet.com>
- References: <49kmbp$3hn@news.mel.aone.net.au> <4cvg4a$9do@news.accessorl.net> <jjacobs-1301960959300001@chelsey.esslink.com> <4dkgth$d2t@rocky.scvnet.com> <massello-2001960235020001@ip196.elp.primenet.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: p021.scvnet.com
- X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
-
- massello@primenet.com (Neill A Massello) wrote:
-
- >In article <4dkgth$d2t@rocky.scvnet.com>, ggandcg@val.net (Graham Gelberg)
- >wrote:
-
- >> BTW, I tried out (and returned) three other 28.8k modems prior to the
- >> Supra, which outperformed them all. I use the factory default init.
- >> string for PC's.
-
- >Don't be a tease, drop some names.
-
- Hmmm... Let's see...
-
- Cardinal 28.8 w/Flash ROM, USR Sportster 28.8 (found out later it was
- manufactured during the time of the spiraling death problem), and an
- el cheapo no-name 28.8 from Fry's (used as an experiment to see if
- price = performance -- it does!).
-
- Greg
-
-
-